Indonesian Journal of Classroom Action Research (IJCAR)
Home - Journal - Indonesian Journal of Classroom Action Research (IJCAR)
INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH (IJCAR)
is a journal that contains articles on the results of classroom studies from all researchers, lecturers, and teachers. This journal is one of the reputable journals in Indonesia that the DAS Institute has published.
Indonesian Journal of Classroom Action Research (IJCAR) is published 2 (two) times a year in July and January. This journal provides open access and free-of-charge submission to the public and will support the exchange of knowledge about research results in the field of education.
Indonesian Journal of Classroom Action Research (IJCAR) aims to provide high-quality papers and critical issues in the field of education, including:
- Teaching and Learning Innovation,
- Instructional Design and Methodology,
- E-learning,
- Teacher Education,
- Educational Technology,
- Learning Environment,
- Assessment of Educational Practices,
- Classroom Research,
- Islamic Education Curriculum.
Indonesian Journal of Classroom Action Research (IJCAR), published by DAS Institute, has e-ISSN 3025-0730 and became a Crossref member in 2023 with the prefix 10.53866. Therefore, All articles published by the Indonesian Journal of Classroom Action Research (IJCAR) will have unique DOI numbers with the prefix 10.53866 since Vol. 1, No. 1, July 2023.
Indonesian Journal of Classroom Action Research (IJCAR) is currently indexed/listed in Crossref, Google Scholar, Dimensions, GARUDA, Index Copernicus International, WorldCat, Scilit, EuroPub, TEI, ESJI, DRJI, ResearchBib, Neliti, J-Gate, ResearchGate, etc.
Focus and Scope
Indonesian Journal of Classroom Action Research (IJCAR) aims to provide high-quality papers and critical issues in the field of education, including:
- Teaching and Learning Innovation,
- Instructional Design and Methodology,
- E-learning,
- Teacher Education,
- Educational Technology,
- Learning Environment,
- Assessment of Educational Practices,
- Classroom Research,
- Islamic Education Curriculum.
Peer Review Process
The Peer Review Process
The peer review process can be broadly summarized into 9 steps, although these steps can vary slightly between journals. Explore what’s involved, below.
Editor Feedback: “Reviewers should remember that they are representing the readers of the journal. Will the readers of this particular journal find this informative and useful?”
1. Submission of Paper
The corresponding or submitting author submits the paper to the journal. This is usually via an online system. Occasionally, journals may accept submissions by email.
2. Editorial Office Assessment
The Editorial Office checks that the paper adheres to the requirements described in the journal’s Author Guidelines. The quality of the paper is not assessed at this point.
3. Appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief (EIC)
The EIC checks assess the paper, considering its scope, originality and merits. The EiC may reject the paper at this stage.
4. Invitation to Reviewers
The handling editor sends invitations to individuals he or she believes would be appropriate reviewers. As responses are received, further invitations are issued, if necessary, until the required number of reviewers is secured– commonly this is 2, but there is some variation between journals.
5. Response to Invitations
Potential reviewers consider the invitation against their expertise, conflicts of interest and availability. They then accept or decline the invitation to review. If possible, when declining, they might also suggest alternative reviewers.
6. Review is Conducted
The reviewer sets time aside to read the paper several times. The first read is used to form an initial impression of the work. If major problems are found at this stage, the reviewer may feel comfortable rejecting the paper without further work. Otherwise, they will read the paper several more times, taking notes to build a detailed point-by-point review. The review is then submitted to the journal, with the reviewer’s recommendation (e.g. to revise, accept or reject the paper).
7. Journal Evaluates the Reviews
The handling editor considers all the returned reviews before making a decision. If the reviews differ widely, the editor may invite an additional reviewer to get an extra opinion before making a decision.
8. The Decision is Communicated
The editor sends a decision email to the author including any relevant reviewer comments. Comments will be anonymous if the journal follows a single-anonymous or double-anonymous peer review model. Journals following an open or transparent peer review model will share the identities of the reviewers with the author(s).
9. Next Steps
If accepted, the paper is sent to production. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the handling editor should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. At this point, reviewers should also be sent an email or letter letting them know the outcome of their review. If the paper was sent back for revision, the reviewers should expect to receive a new version, unless they have opted out of further participation. However, where only minor changes were requested this follow-up review might be done by the handling editor.
Publication Ethic
| IJCAR: Indonesian Journal of Class Action Research is a peer-reviewed International journal, available in print and online and published two times a year. This statement clarifies the ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer and the publisher DAS Institute. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors. |
| Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication |
| The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed IJCAR: Indonesian Journal of Class Action Research is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behaviour for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher, and the society. DAS Institute as the publisher of IJCAR: Indonesian Journal of Class Action Research, takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing seriously, and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint, or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. |
| Publication Decisions |
| The editor of the IJCAR: Indonesian Journal of Class Action Research is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal’s editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision. |
| Fair Play |
| An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for a) economics, b) law, c) communication, d) education, and e) application of technology. |
| Confidentiality |
| The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate. |
| Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest |
| Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor’s research without the express written consent of the author. |
| Duties of Reviewers |
| Contribution to Editorial Decisions Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper. Promptness Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Confidentiality Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor. Standards of Objectivity Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments. Acknowledgement of Sources Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. |
| Duties of Authors |
| Reporting standards Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable. Originality and Plagiarism The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable. Acknowledgement of Sources Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Authorship of the Paper Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. Fundamental errors in published works When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, the author must promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper. |
Author Guidelines
Author Guidelines
The Manuscripts
The manuscript should be an original research paper that sufficiently contributes novelty to education. Authors are requested to submit their papers electronically by using the Indonesian Journal of Classroom Action Research online submission procedure. The corresponding author should also provide a statement that the manuscript is not concurrently being under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Editors will ignore submissions that do not follow these procedures.
General Guide of Manuscript
The manuscript format could be sent in MS Word.docx. A submitted manuscript accepted for publication or even published elsewhere is unacceptable and will not be published in the Indonesian Journal of Classroom Action Research. Manuscripts that are revisions or elaborations of seminar, symposium, and workshop manuscripts could be published in the Indonesian Journal of Classroom Action Research by mentioning such things while submitting them. Manuscripts sent to the Indonesian Journal of Classroom Action Research must be free from plagiarism and self-plagiarism.
Template of Manuscript
Before article submission to the journal’s website, the manuscript layout is previously carried out as the writing format guidelines of the Indonesian Journal of Classroom Action Research. A template for writing the manuscript for the Indonesian Journal of Classroom Action Research and complete guidelines for writing could be downloaded HERE.
Structure of the manuscripts
1. Title. (Concise and informative. Titles are often used in information-retrieval systems. Avoid abbreviations and formulae where possible).
2. Author’s names and institutions. The author’s name should be accompanied by the author’s Name, Affiliation (Department and Faculty Name), Name of Organization, City, and Country, without any academic title. For a joint paper, one of the authors should be notified as the corresponding author with an email address.
3. Abstract and keywords. Abstract: A concise and factual abstract is required (maximum length of 200 words). The abstract should state briefly the purpose of the research, the principal results, and major conclusions. An abstract is often presented separately from the article, so it must be able to stand alone. References should, therefore, be avoided, but if essential, they must be cited in full, without reference to the reference list. Non-standard or uncommon abbreviations should be avoided, but if essential they must be defined at their first mention in the abstract itself. Keywords: Immediately after the abstract, provide a maximum of five keywords, avoiding general and plural terms and multiple concepts (avoid, for example, ‘and’, ‘of’). Be sparing with abbreviations: only abbreviations firmly established in the field may be eligible. These keywords will be used for indexing purposes.
4. Introduction. State the objectives of the work and provide an adequate background, avoiding a detailed literature survey or a summary of the results.
5. Methods. The research design and method should be clearly defined.
6. Results. Results should be clear and concise.
7. Discussion. The discussion should explore the significance of the results of the work, not repeat them. A combined Results and Discussion section is often appropriate. Avoid extensive citations and discussion of published literature.
8. Conclusion and Recommendation. The main conclusions of the study may be presented in a short Conclusions section, which may stand alone or form a subsection of a Discussion or Results and Discussion section. The Recommendation may be the objective of the research. Therefore at least one of your objectives of the paper is to provide recommendations to the parties associated or the parties that will benefit from your research.
9. References. This section lists only the papers, books, or other types of publications referred to in the body of the manuscript.
General Writing Format
The article must be typed in 1 (one) spaced, Book Antiqua font with size 10 pts except for the abstract and on A4 paper size.
The article must be 12 pages maximum including the bibliography and appendix.
The article must include abstracts in English and be followed by keywords (3-5 words). Abstract and keywords are typed in 1 spaced and Book Antiqua 9 PTA
Foreign and regional words that are not standardized in KBBI (Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia) should be written in italics.
The citation must be in the form of in-text and the bibliography is based on APA 6th Edition (American Psychological Association)
References are typed in single-spaced and Book Antiqua 10 PTA. The Authors are encouraged to use journals as the main references and avoid using web articles (SCOPUS-indexed journals are recommended). The bibliography must be the last 10 years’ publication except for any foundational works e.g. learning theories, framework, etc.
Specific Writing Format
1. Equations and formulas should be numbered as (1), (2)…etc appearing to their right.
2. Estimation results from a software package are not allowed to be directly presented in the paper. They should be presented in summary tables.
Tables and Figures
Tables and figures should be presented as follows:
1. The name of tables and figures should follow a numbering system (Arabic numbering system). The title of the tables and figures are placed at the top and the bottom respectively.
2. The tables and figures should provide the source of information, if any, at the bottom.
3. Any table should contain only the heading and contents. The table contains row lines only without column lines. Note(s) and source(s) should be included underneath the table where appropriate.
Acknowledgment
Acknowledgment, if any, including information on grants received, before the references, in a separate section, and not as a footnote on the title page.
Subjects and Authors Index
The authors should provide an index of the subject, namely the specific terms in the manuscript. The authors should also provide the index of authors, namely the key authors of papers referred to in the manuscript. Please write the family name followed by the given name.
Citation
Citation in the text body should be written using the family name and years of publication. Example:
a. Hill (2001) suggests that the objective of depreciation is…
b. Inflation targeting would be sufficient (McCain, 1982).
c. The definition of contagion is … (Wagner, 1976; Rhonda 2009).
d. The Authors are recommended to use Mendeley Reference software.
References
The manuscript is expected to involve approximately 20-25 primary and up-to-date references to assert high-quality contributions to the knowledge development. Citations and references must strictly follow the APA (American Psychological Association) style. References should include only works that are cited within the text of the manuscript. Consulting the APA style manual (http://www.apastyle.org/pubmanual.html) is strongly recommended for completing manuscript submissions.
References should appear as:
Book with one author:
Author, A.A. (2015). Title of Work. Location/City, State: Publisher.
Book with two authors:
Author, A.A. & Author, B.B. (2015). Title of Work. Location/City, State: Publisher.
Book with more than two authors:
Author, A.A., Author, B.B., & Author, C.C. (2015). Title of Work. Location/City, State: Publisher.
Journal article:
Irwanto, D., & Yuningsih, N. (2021). The Effects of the Number of Coated Fuel Particles on the Neutronic Aspects of 25 MWt Pebble Bed Reactor with Thorium Fuel. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(1), 102-106. doi:https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7i1.544.
Edited book:
Author, A.A. (Ed.). (2019). Title of Work. Location/City, State: Publisher.
Unpublished doctoral dissertation or master’s thesis:
Author, A.A. (2019). Title of Work. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University.
Editorial Team
Editorial Office
Editor-in-Chief
Chulalongkorn University, Thailand
editor.ijcar@das-institute.com
Layout Editor
Agus Darmawan, Universitas Gajah Mada, Indonesia
Advisory Board
Prof. Dr. Noawanit Songkram, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand
Prof. Dr. Christoph Kulgemeyer, Paderborn University, Germany
Prof. Juhaeri, Ph.D, University of North Carolina, United States of America
Assoc. Prof. Saori Nishikawa, Ph.D, Kumamoto University, Japan
Assoc. Prof. Tomita Akihiko, Ph.D, Wakayama University, Japan
Assoc. Prof. Sasithep Pitiporntapin, Ph.D, Kasetsart University, Thailand
Assist. Prof. Wutthisak Bunnaen, Ph.D, Mahasarakham University, Thailand
Agung Purwa Widiyan, Ph.D, Yogyakarta State University, Indonsia
Dr. Andi Wahyudi, M.Pd, Alma Ata University, Indonesia
Dr. Endi Rochaendi, M.Pd, Alma Ata University, Indonesia
Dr. Aida Hayani, Alma Ata University, Indonesia
Nur Kholik, M.S.I, Alma Ata University, Indonesia
Reviewers
Reviewers
We sincerely thank our reviewers for excellent work. IJCAR could not operate without high-quality reviews.
2023
The following 12 reviewers contributed to accept and decline decisions:
Agung Purwa Widiyan, Aida Hayani, Amir Sahidin, Asep Sunarko, Endi Rochaendi, Ermita Ali, Ismanto, Lidwina Felisima Tae, Roni Permana, Tiar Sugiarti, Toufan Aldian Syah, Zulmi Ramdani.
Author Fees
Article Processing Charge
This journal charges the following author fees:
Submission Fees: 0.00 (USD)
Authors are NOT required to pay Article Submission Fee as part of the submission process to contribute to review costs.
Editorial Processing Charges: 0.00 (USD)
Authors are NOT required to pay Editorial Processing Charges as part of the submission process to contribute to review fees.
Article Processing Charges (APC): 0.00 (USD)
Authors are NOT required to pay Article Processing Charges (APC) as part of the publishing process.
Page Charges
Authors are NOT required to pay Page Charges as part of the publishing process.
Colour Charges: 0.00 (USD)
Authors are NOT required to pay Colour Charges as part of the publishing process.
FOR MORE INFORMATION
Please contact the editorial office: editor.ijcar@das-institute.com
Open Access Policy
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public, supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. This journal is open access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to users or institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to full text articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or author. This is in accordance with the Budapest Open Access Initiative.
Contact
Contact
Perum Palm Estate No. 6A, Penambongan, Purbalingga, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
53314
